Advertisement

Diagnostic value of clinical examination and radiographic imaging in identification of intraocular foreign bodies in open globe injury

Diagnostic value of clinical examination and radiographic imaging in identification of intraocular foreign bodies in open globe injury

Eur J Ophthalmol 2012; 22(2): 259 - 268

Article Type: ORIGINAL ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/EJO.2011.8347

Authors

Shriji N. Patel, Paul D. Langer, Marco A. Zarbin, Neelakshi Bhagat

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical eye examination and radiographic imaging in the identification of intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) in open-globe traumatic injuries.  Methods. This was a retrospective chart review of open-globe traumatic injuries with IOFBs presenting to University Hospital (UH) at New Jersey Medical School between 1998 and 2008. Results. A total of 527 patients with traumatic open globe injuries presented to UH, Newark, New Jersey, USA, between 1998 and 2008. Of these, 74 patients had surgically confirmed IOFBs. Mean age of patients with traumatic open globe injury and an IOFB was 33 years (range, 8-69 years); mean follow-up was 17.6 months (range, 1 day–90 months). Foreign bodies were identified as glass (13), metal (58), wood (1), plastic (0), and other (2). There were 24 anterior segment (AS) IOFBs, 45 posterior segment (PS) IOFBs, and 5 noted in both segments. Clinical eye examination at presentation identified an IOFB in 34 (45.6%) of 74 patients. B-scan echography revealed an IOFB in 14 (51.9%) of 27 cases. Computed tomography scan of the orbits identified IOFBs in 56 (94.9%) of 59 cases. Clinical eye examination was performed in all (100%) patients. B-scan was performed only when posterior segment pathology was suspected. Computed tomography scan was performed when an IOFB or orbital fracture was suspected.  Conclusions. Computed tomography scan was the most reliable method for identifying IOFBs in patients presenting with open globe injuries in comparison to clinical eye examination and B-scan echography. This result was consistent regardless of IOFB location within the globe.

Article History

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36.00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

  • Patel, Shriji N. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey - USA
  • Langer, Paul D. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey - USA
  • Zarbin, Marco A. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey - USA
  • Bhagat, Neelakshi [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
    The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey - USA

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.